Austin Peay
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,232  Mathew Biwott JR 33:58
1,491  Wesley Gray JR 34:19
1,497  Nash Young SO 34:19
1,574  Shadrack Matelong SR 34:25
1,617  Hezron Kiptoo SO 34:29
2,010  Tyler Smith SO 35:08
2,541  Thomas Porter FR 36:33
2,666  Elliot Giles FR 37:08
2,847  Daniel Davis FR 38:34
2,858  Andrew Abel SO 38:43
National Rank #206 of 315
South Region Rank #23 of 41
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 24th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 9.8%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Mathew Biwott Wesley Gray Nash Young Shadrack Matelong Hezron Kiptoo Tyler Smith Thomas Porter Elliot Giles Daniel Davis Andrew Abel
Commodore Classic 09/16 1224 34:34 34:53 34:10 34:18 34:19 36:13 36:24 36:33 39:38
Louisville Classic (Blue) 09/30 1229 33:50 33:58 34:21 34:47 35:15 37:27 38:22 40:22
UE Invite 10/14 1215 33:36 34:20 33:55 34:50 34:49 35:13 37:29 38:45 38:47
Ohio Valley Championship 10/28 1203 33:59 34:04 34:20 34:26 34:06 36:11 37:04 38:07 38:35
South Region Championships 11/10 1297 33:57 34:22 34:22 35:34 37:25





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 23.1 639 0.1 0.5 1.2 3.3 4.9 8.6 15.0 21.9 23.3 14.7 5.4 1.3 0.2



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Mathew Biwott 107.7
Wesley Gray 126.7
Nash Young 127.8
Shadrack Matelong 132.9
Hezron Kiptoo 135.3
Tyler Smith 164.0
Thomas Porter 208.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 0.1% 0.1 16
17 0.5% 0.5 17
18 1.2% 1.2 18
19 3.3% 3.3 19
20 4.9% 4.9 20
21 8.6% 8.6 21
22 15.0% 15.0 22
23 21.9% 21.9 23
24 23.3% 23.3 24
25 14.7% 14.7 25
26 5.4% 5.4 26
27 1.3% 1.3 27
28 0.2% 0.2 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0